By Christine Schaefer
How did a quality awards program originally aimed at helping U.S. manufacturers become more competitive evolve to help school districts and other education institutions improve their performance, too? Long story, and it starts before 1999, when Congress expanded the eligibility of the Baldrige Awards to health care and education organizations.
In fact, the Baldrige Program began preparing for that expansion in the mid-1990s. Early efforts included outreach to education organizations to seek their input on the Criteria and to develop other resources to help such organizations use the Baldrige systems framework to improve their performance. To learn more about that foundational work, I recently interviewed two former Baldrige Program staff members, John Jasinski and Sue Rohan.
John served as an education specialist in the Baldrige Program’s offices in Gaithersburg, Maryland, for the year starting in August 1994. At the time, he was on a sabbatical from a position at Northwest Missouri State University, where he was contributing to quality initiatives. He was also completing a Ph.D. program at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln that focused on performance excellence in higher education.
Sue also arrived in 1994 to serve the Baldrige Program as an education specialist. Previously, she had been quality improvement director for the University of Wisconsin’s 26-campus system.
John and Sue were both recruited to help the Baldrige Program develop the first Education Criteria (completed in 1995) and the first case study, which would provide a sample Baldrige Award application for education organizations. “It was a time to roll up your sleeves and dive right in,” says John. “We were creating an education model that did not exist, so it was a very dynamic period. We were trying to see how the Baldrige Program could aid the education community moving forward.”
John and Sue sought and aggregated input from education organizations and then shared the information with Curt Reimann, the program’s first director, who was overseeing the Education Criteria development. “We canvassed not just the country but also the international community. We tapped experts in assessment, in organizational dynamics, and in education performance through forums and dialogues,” says John. He notes that a key to the success of the effort “was creating a platform for collecting a wide array of input. With Curt’s lead, we were systematic about how we wanted to collect input and from whom, creating dialogues throughout that year.”
According to Sue, collecting input from a broad range of educators and organizations, including K-12 schools, technical schools, and colleges and universities, ensured a “diverse and well-rounded perspective.” She adds that one challenge was the perception that business terminology in the Criteria was not applicable to education organizations. “In education, students and learning are the key focus, as opposed to customers. It was sometimes a challenge for educational leaders to see their roles in education systems as parallel to those of employees in businesses.” Another challenge, she said, was that in colleges and universities, faculty members have multiple roles in education research and community service. “We tried to address that in the Education Criteria,” she says.
Nine education organizations have received the Baldrige Award since 2001, and perhaps thousands more have used the Criteria to continually improve their performance. The role models include six public school districts, a public university, an undergraduate business school within a university, and a community college.
Asked about the future of Baldrige in education, John is optimistic: “The seeds that we planted in 1994 and 1995 certainly have taken root and blossomed over the past nearly 20 years. We’re seeing enlightened educators across the education spectrum, no matter what level or type of education—and we can look with pride at those that have adopted the Baldrige core values and the principles of performance excellence within their own organizations.”
John also points out the continued relevance of the Criteria to organizations in his sector as a basis for hope of more use of the framework by education organizations: “There’s still a dire need out there for education organizations to continue to challenge themselves. As we look at some of the issues that were present back in 1993 to 1995 and fast forward to today the issues are similar and perhaps more pointed. So I don’t think there’s ever been a better time for education organizations to reach out to the Baldrige Program and use the Education Criteria to better themselves.”
Observing that the Baldrige Program’s public-private partnership is unique and “sometimes taken for granted,” John says he believes “that partnership can be reinvigorated and adopted.” He adds, “The education community needs to continue to partner with the business community and the health care community. That was our vision back then [in 1994-1995]—that one day, we’ll all be speaking the same language across sectors—and we’re closer to it today in terms of the importance of processes and results, and cause and effect. If we all understand our challenges and how we can partner across sectors, we will continue to enhance the legacy of the Baldrige Program.”
After staying with the Baldrige Program until 2001, Sue continues to apply Baldrige principles in her work today for Health Care Service Corporation, the largest not-for-profit U.S insurer. “We work with health care providers to ensure quality services for members enrolled in this insurance,” she explains. “We use Baldrige principles to plan for and measure health care outcomes and member satisfaction and other results.”
“There’s a real tie-in between what’s happening in health care and education,” she adds. “Health care is taking a larger share of state budgets, and educators are challenged to get an adequate share for education. So everyone is faced with doing more with less, and Baldrige principles are critical in fostering high achievement.”
As president of Northwest Missouri State University today, John has remained deeply involved in the Baldrige Program, serving in multiple roles as an examiner and (currently) a judge. Most important, he says, is his role as an ambassador of the Baldrige Program. Describing his year with the Baldrige Program as a personal growth experience for both him and his family (as he and his wife Denise then had young children), John likens his experience to that of the program itself, which he notes was “young at the time and continues to mature.”
Now looking forward to the next revision of the Education Criteria (copies of the 2013-2014 booklets will be available by early 2013), John says, “The Criteria have remained vibrant and cutting-edge. This is a fantastic 25-year-old and ever-evolving program, with so many passionate and beautiful people focused on bettering our competitiveness and communities.”
If you were involved in the early history of the Baldrige Program, please consider sharing your reflections with us here. As the Baldrige Program celebrates its 25th anniversary this year, we hope to keep learning and growing to better serve organizations in every sector.